Thursday 22 Nov 2018
Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT): employees’ private use of vehicles
ATO to contact clients over bank details
ATO claws back $850m in unpaid SG in FY 17-18
Appetite for property in SMSFs shows signs of life despite tough market
Superannuation gender gap narrowing, research shows
Identification numbers for directors
How financial advice helps create wealth.
Australia's vital statistics
Unlocking equity crowdfunding in Australia
$20m boost for SME clients looking to exporting
Work-Related Expenses
ATO updates crypto guidance
ATO zones in on hundreds of newly created reserves
Senate passes $20,000 instant asset write-off extension
Victorian Vacant Property Tax
Director Penalty Notices
ATO set to pounce on undisclosed income streams
In case you missed it – The company tax Bill that did pass Parliament.
GST spotlight headed to smaller end of town
Superannuation Amnesty – Maybe! Maybe Not!
ATO drills in car-sharing focus this tax time
What is Bankruptcy?
Update of Australia's vital statistics
ATO speaks on risk factors, surveillance triggers for FY19
ATO’s corporate residency guidance cops backlash
ATO dispels top tax time myths to clients as clampdown rolls out
Tools for budgeting, cash flow, Super and more ….
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 2 of 2011
Articles
When to put tax schemes to the test
Scrutiny on Takings
Benchmarking and Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Aggressive Approach
SMSF Member Verification System Made Easier
Federal Budget 2011-12.    At a Glance
Federal Budget 2011-12.   Overview
Outstanding Tax returns - Some Years?
Tax advice privilege for Accountants a possibility
Egg on Face? - Benchmark by Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Withdrawn
When to put tax schemes to the test

As another financial year draws to a close we are moving into the sharp end of the tax planning season.


Tax is a major headwind to any investment and everyone has the right to minimise the amount of tax they pay through legal tax planning arrangements. Indeed the after-tax return is the critical measure for any investment.

But sometimes the desire to reduce tax can blind people to the risks – both investment and legal – that certain tax schemes, sophisticated and otherwise, carry with them.

In recent years the collapse of a number of high-profile agribusiness and financing schemes have painfully served to alert people to the dangers of committing to tax schemes that promise upfront tax benefits and potential investment returns that ultimately never materialised.

This year the Australian Tax Office has produced a plain language guide - Understanding tax-effective investments - on what to look out for among some of the more common types of tax schemes that the ATO has encountered that have caught out both individual investors and businesses.

For individuals it covers a range of schemes from “mortgage management” arrangements where the promoter offers a way to create tax deductions equivalent to your home loan interest payments by refinancing your home loan, through to traps with scholarship trusts and education funding programs, and on to illegal early release super arrangements.

One of the lessons from the ATO booklet is that not all these schemes fall into the obviously “too good to be true” category. Some are sophisticated trust structures with all the hallmarks of “expert” opinions.

These type of arrangements provide an interesting backdrop to the overhaul of the financial planning licensing and remuneration regime being proposed by the Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services and Superannuation, Bill Shorten.

One of the challenges as an investor is being able to separate the tax scheme “promoter” from “adviser”. Participating accountants, lawyers and advisers have been generously remunerated for their support of tax schemes in the past – following the collapse of some agribusiness schemes, commission payments of between 10 and 15 per cent were revealed.

That is precisely the type of conflicted payment structure the government is aiming to outlaw with its ban on commission payments and volume-based incentives within the Future of Financial Advice reforms.

However, while that may provide a new world order for mainstream licensed financial planners it may not prevent the unscrupulous and unlicensed types from operating in the shadows between the accounting and financial planning worlds – indeed most mainstream financial planning businesses were advising clients to avoid those type of schemes.

A key question investors should ask themselves is if the tax deduction was not there would the investment still stack up on its own merits?

The ATO suggests the alarm bells should be going off with arrangements that:

  • Offer zero risk guarantees
  • Do not have a prospectus or product disclosure statement
  • Refer you to a specific adviser or expert
  • Ask you to maintain secrecy to protect the arrangement from rival firms and discourage you from getting independent advice.

Any of those points ought to have the alarm bells ringing loudly but the last point is perhaps the most telling. If someone is trying to get you to sign up for an investment but really does not want you getting your own independent advice that should be a signal to walk away – fast.

Robin Bowerman
Principal, Corporate Affairs & Market Development at Vanguard Investments Australia.
20-5-11

 



9th-June-2011